9 December 2009
Group 1: History – Our Daily Bread
Group 1: History – Our Daily Bread
Our group was particularly intrigued by the history of the family in the video meditation. Since dialogue was sparse throughout the film, we as audience members had to infer much about their history in terms of traditions, background, heritage, and current history. The skill and ease with which they navigated the farmland showed us that they have farmed for a while, and we assumed that it was generational occupation since the work was tended by everyone from the young teenager to the graying matriarch.
While the first portion of the film was narrated by Spanish, when the young teenagers cleaned up and went into town for ice cream, they spoke English. Kari noted that the trip to town for ice cream on Saturday may be a new ritual they have picked up since moving to Michigan. We wondered as a group how the family’s narrative was affected by their relocating to Michigan. What does their current story/present history look like? How does it differ with what they experienced before the relocation?
Stephanie directed our conversation to the role of churches in established communities in connecting with people and groups from other cultures. Stephanie wrote, “The church is to welcome all people with open arms and show Christ’s love to all. Does the church really do this?”
We discussed how difficult it can be, especially for established rural communities in the Midwest, to open themselves to immigrant populations. It’s difficult for more traditional churches to face change, and it’s difficult for smaller ethnic groups to know how to integrate themselves into such established communities. Kevin noted how the video meditation helped him see how hard migrant workers are really working to integrate, which dispels the myth that they’re not trying to integrate.
Kari noted that integration might not be as difficult a task as we think. She noted that there are strong parallels between our own Norwegian (and Swedish) American Lutheran roots and Mexican culture. For example, as Maryanne noted, food and family are very important in the Latino community – along with singing and dancing. God is the center of this family’s work and life. The same can be said of Scandinavian Lutheran culture in the Midwest. Kari wrote, “I think there is far more that unites than divides us. I suspect sharing our histories with one another may be a key to overcoming some of the difficulties we have in integrating rural communities.”
Similarly, Rebecca noted that the Colorado piece was especially helpful in navigating the roadblocks to listening to the history of someone else’s culture and heritage. She wrote, “One way we can overcome our fear is to learn and get to know someone else’s culture. I think this is what Mary Boy means between knowing and doing. The goal of “Who is my Neighbor?” piece is to assess what is one’s prior knowledge or assumption of what immigration is and looks like.
Our cultures, language, and heritage may diverse and very different, but we also have a common culture, heritage and possible language as children of God. Maryanne noted that it’s important to recognize that God is a part of our daily lives, whoever we are or wherever we may be.
This entry was posted on Wednesday, December 9th, 2009 at 7:58 pm. You can follow any responses to this entry through this RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

10 December 2009 at 8:59 pm
This week it was appearent that it is incredibly easy to not see things that are unfamiliar to you. Part of my history is that I have never seen a migrant worker, and I have never seen agriculture except for large combines and other machines working a farm. It was very dificult for me to connect this week. I have never been somewhere where I don’t speak the language, or had to go some where to find work because I had to not because I wanted to.
One thing my group helped me find this week though is that I do have some connections to this group of migrant workers. They are small, but there are some. Like I know what its like to leave a place behind and move to where I know almost no one and the fear that comes with it. I also would stick out in a rural community, but in a different way then the migrant workers. While these aren’t large connections its a start.
And its when we start to see how we are connected that is when we start noticing people that are different from us. Its very easy to ignore what you don’t understand.
11 December 2009 at 10:05 am
Becoming a stranger and minority in “their” midst can be very informative (e.g., rural boy coming to the suburbs and discovering he has much more in common with urbans and international students than with the alien suburbans, who give him blank stares or walk right on by when he tries to understand and share his culture shock). I agree that it is very hard to see these things for those who are part of the majority subculture.
11 December 2009 at 10:32 am
Excellent points about how difficult it is for groups to open up to others – even when they want to. As your group noted, often times all that is needed to begin the process is looking for the commonality and strengths of community. It’s difficult to get beyond the “but that’s the way we’ve always done it” mentality, especially in small town and rural areas. I think the Colorado discussion guide would help break down some of that “set in stone” mentality – especially coupled with a focus on what we all have in common.
Dianne Derrick Group 3
12 December 2009 at 12:59 am
Your question of “does the church really do this?” referring to welcoming all people has made me think. Of course we say we are and sometimes even truly think we are. But I think it’s hard to tell unless you’re on the other side. How do we know what might make a person feel welcome? Maybe even in our attempts to be welcoming we’ve actually done the opposite. A coffee hour after worship isn’t really welcoming when everyone talks in tight circles with only the people they know- a new person would definitely feel as though they do not belong. It’s also common for groups to expect new people to shed all of their particularity when they join the group and become just like everyone else rather than contribute to a diverse group (melting pot vs mixed salad), whether that’s conscious or unconscious. Very much the “this is how we do things here” mentality.
12 December 2009 at 5:12 pm
It’s interesting that you bring up the video as showing how migrant workers are working hard to integrate. I felt that the video really showed how they are their own seperate community with little to no integration with others. They worked together, ate together, worshipped together, had recreational time together. It is hard for people to integrate or want to integrate in general…people are naturally drawn to others that they feel are similar to themselves.
13 December 2009 at 2:58 pm
I think Jacqueline makes a good point – sometimes when we attempt to be welcoming, we may actually do the opposite. I think that in order to welcome people we may need to experience life from their persepctive in order to gain a deeper understanding of what it means to be welcomed.