Along with listening to the songs and analyzing them in respect to prayer, we were asked to assess the learning environments and designs that are present within the songs; first, according to Jane Vella’s list of principles for learning, and then according to lists of verbs and/or a “Rubric of Understanding”. Finally, we were asked to pinpoint any challenges that we see in the learning environments. We will give a detailed use of the rubric with song one and then use the verbs for the remaining songs.
Song 1: This song is written from one person to another person or people. Because it is not directed at God, it could be difficult to view it as a prayer. More than a prayer itself, this song seems to be motivating people to begin a life of prayer. However, we could view the song as being sung to God, asking God; “where were you?”, “what were you doing?” We found Vella’s principles of: ”learning with ideas, feelings, and actions” and “immediacy”. The entire song is talking about feelings and actions that one may have had or taken after 9-11 and then suggesting what we can learn from those feelings and actions. The song does a good job of focusing on the main point- or what is “really useful” and that is that the greatest thing God gave us is love. We analyzed this song according to the Rubric of Understanding:
Explanation: In-depth to sophisticated – using this event as an opportunity to stop and explore our emotional response, our relationships with other people, the meaning in our lives, and how that changed our actions, rather than simply analyzing the plane-to-building incident or its political inter-national/inter-religious ramifications, provides an inventive framework and unique perspective for situating the event in our lives.
Interpretation: Profound – the song invites us to view the incident as a call to look inside ourselves and review the deepest sources of meaning in our lives.
Application: Masterful – the invitation to interpretation-that-leads-to-action went in many diverse directions, all of them relational. As we listen to the song and look back at how the event affected our understanding of our relationships, or at least the relative importance of them, what actions did we take in response to this new understanding?
Perspective: Considered to Insightful – Jackson didn’t really argue “his perspective” in contrast to others — he focuses on encouraging others to explore their own reactions, although he does briefly articulate his own.
Empathy: Sensitive to Mature – the range of examples the singer lifts up, as he asks the hearers what emotional responses and actions they took in response to 9/11 consider a full range from helpful/positive to fearful/negative.
Self-Knowledge: Circumspect to Wise – Given this atypical response toward love rather than hate, it is fair to assume wisdom in understanding of the prejudices and projections operating in himself and others. He also explicitly states his ignorance toward the situation: no strong political stance, no idea about the difference in [sic] Iraq and Iran.
One challenge that we identified was the understanding of the concept of love. Do the learners/listeners fully understand that the greatest commandment of love applies to all, even our enemies?
Song 2: This song could be used as a way to thank God for the “ordinary” miracles that he has created in our lives each and every moment of every day. However, once again it is more of a song from one person to another, encouraging them to see the miracles that exist all around us. We found Vella’s principles of “learning with ideas, feelings, and actions” and possibly also “teamwork” is suggested as she states that we are all a part of the ordinary miracle and we all need to give. The affective verbs stood out to us: share, celebrate, value, enjoy, notice, respond to, and change. Words and music are used to create emotion and try to bring about change in others…so other verbs include verbal, musical, and interpersonal. For the Rubric of Understanding: Explanation—sophisticated, Interpretation—revealing, Application—masterful, Perspective—aware, Empathy—mature, Self-knowledge—thoughtful. One challenge that we identified was the song not specifically mentioning God as being responsible for the ordinary miracles.
Song 3: This song does contain dialogue from the author to God; words like, “Father help us” and ”send us guidance from above”, however, much of the song is addressed to people and not to God. In terms of assessment again we found: “learning with ideas, feelings, and actions”, and also “Needs assessment”. The song attempts to focus attention on the problem of violence and urges listeners to diagnose what is needed to bring more love into the world. We selected affective verbs, verbal, musical, and interpersonal. The challenge found was focusing too much on the negative, pointing out only bad things in the world, asking ”where is the love” and suggesting that love will one day be found as if we have no love right now.
Song 4: We found this song to be prayerful. It moves from a more general/communal “city of ruins” to a personal “city of ruins”. It states the despair and need for prayer and then encourages people to “rise up” and pray. The last part of the song goes from being a personal “I pray for…” to a more communal “we pray for”. Vella’s principle of “sequence” was suggested as the song moves from communal to personal and then from personal back to communal, along with “Immediacy” in the idea of “rising up”, “Action with reflection, or praxis” in that Springsteen is motivating his listeners not to give way to fear but to pray for the strength to rise up, and then of course “learning with ideas, feelings, and actions.” Again verbal, musical, and interpersonal verbs stood out to us, as well as bodily in being asked to “rise up”. Although it had a similar message to song number 2, this song put it in a more hopeful and positive way.
Song 5: We all agreed that we would not want to use this song as a prayer. This song is different in that it is from God to us. “Clear roles” are identified in this song, and we also noted Vella’s principle of “engagement”. The song engages the listener to reject its point of view or agree with its view blaming God for evil in the world. Again “learning with ideas, feelings, and actions” was present. The song does use affective learning and also verbal and musical methods. This song may be more intrapersonal though as it is mainly about God and his own personal feelings and isn’t really encouraging interaction with others…although it may encourage others to not put faith in God.
Song 6: This song seemed to be the only one that had differing views among our group members. A couple of group members had a hard time understanding it. I personally like the song and can see the refrain as being very prayerful; “I pray that my feet don’t fail me now” and “God show me the way”. I see this song as one individual stating his beliefs to the world and not being ashamed. (In the printed lyrics it says “ya’ll” but in the song he actually says “I need Jesus”). In this way he is presenting what he believes and then leaving it up to the listeners to make their own decisions like Vella’s “learners as subjects of their own learning”. Other principles that came up included “engagement” and “safety”- some learners may feel more comfortable/safe expressing themselves within this type of music. Verbs that stood out were affective, verbal, musical, and intrapersonal.
Song 7: This song can be seen as a prayer if we assume that the author of the song is singing it to God. One group member likened it to a Psalm as it openly expresses loneliness and dependence on God. “Learning with ideas, feelings, and actions” was present as well as “action with reflection, or praxis”. The song writer mentions her experiences and reflects on them. The focus becomes an intrapersonal relationship between either two individuals or an individual and God. The verbs that stood out again were affective, verbal, musical, and intrapersonal. A challenge could be that there are not “clear roles” identified in who the song is for.